TONY HODDER SUPPORT SOLUTIONS
Independent Systems Researcher & Creator of the SELFS Framework.
- Locations Of Operation
- Schedule An Appointment
SUPPORT SOLUTIONS
Welcome
Helping others to help themselves
Tony Hodder
Founder Director
I’m an independent systems researcher who measures how care, accountability, and decision-making perform under pressure — and why systems drift when correction arrives too late.
“A supportive, safe environment with nothing but compassion and trust.
Labour Market & Workforce Systems Frameworks
Homeless Youth + Child Restoration Solutions
Addiction, Homelessness & Identity Transition
TONY HODDER
Independent Systems Researcher
& Creator of the SELFS Framework.
Meangingful
Ongoing
Change
Support Systems .
My work exists because systems explain failure after harm occurs instead of correcting early. I don’t provide reassurance.
I provide evidence of where responsibility, timing, and accountability break down — and how to realign them without replacing existing frameworks.
Purpose:
To test whether workforce failure in care systems is driven by individuals — or by structural timing, accountability, and policy application.
What We Did:
We established a self-funded care and training labour marketplace focused exclusively on Child Safety and NDIS environments. We operated as a principal subcontractor to approved providers, supplying skilled workers at reduced cost while embedding ourselves inside live operational systems.
This position allowed us to:
• observe workforce behaviour under real pressure,
• audit how policies functioned in practice (not theory),
• and test how time, supervision, and accountability influenced outcomes.
We prioritised staff confidence, professional identity, and wellbeing — not as “support services,” but as performance conditions required for safe care delivery.
What Was Tested:
• Staff onboarding and supervision under crisis conditions
• Workforce sustainability and retention
• Policy compliance versus practical application
• How time pressure affects decision-making and escalation
What We Learned:
Systems failed not because staff lacked capability, but because time was misused, accountability was diffused, and correction arrived too late. When time was applied deliberately — through clear roles, boundaries, and feedback — performance improved without changing the underlying framework.
Outcome:
Wingman demonstrated that workforce stability improves when systems support timely correction and reciprocal accountability, rather than relying on post-incident reporting.
Purpose:
To test whether early, time-focused intervention could stabilise high-risk young parents and enable safe family reunification.
What We Did:
We self-funded a support program for homeless teenage parents, prioritising time allocation and continuity of care over service volume. New staff were trained and supported to work with clients in a way that centred on their evolving circumstances rather than predefined labels.
Support focused on:
• stable housing,
• consistent daily routines,
• clear priorities,
• and coordinated support across services.
What Was Tested:
• Whether time-bound, consistent support could change outcomes
• Whether young parents could stabilise without coercion
• Whether awareness paired with action could lead to reunification
Outcome:
The child was returned. Housing stabilised. The parents developed confidence and capability through reciprocal responsibility, not dependency.
This outcome was achieved within existing frameworks, without policy change — by using time deliberately and aligning responsibility with action.
Purpose:
To test whether identity change emerges from therapy escalation — or from accountability, stability, and self-selection.
What We Did:
We supported individuals experiencing homelessness and substance addiction by restoring agency and accountability, rather than removing responsibility through over-management.
Support Emphasised:
• self-selection into change,
• practical stability (housing, routine, healthcare),
• and gradual reintegration into work and community life.
What Was Tested:
• Whether accountability strengthens care rather than harms it
• Whether individuals change behaviour when identity is respected
• Whether transparency and time produce sustainable outcomes
Outcome:
Participants stabilised, reduced harmful behaviours, and transitioned toward work and healthier lifestyles.
Success occurred when care was reciprocal, not directive — and when time was used to support identity formation rather than control behaviour.
Meaningful Ongoing Change
Tony Hodder
Supportive Framework
We don’t build systems from scratch - we reflect them. Our framework identifies the patterns already living inside your structure and holds them up to their original purpose. By mapping behaviour over time, we help systems stay true to their intent and evolve with clarity, not confusion.
Supportive Programs
Our programs are designed to bring energy, care, and clarity into your system - whether you’re working with teams, technology, or both. Every program reflects behaviour as a source of wisdom, so outcomes are never based on opinion, but on meaningful, observable truth.
Reflective Intelligence
We reveal what your system is truly doing - not just what it says it’s doing.
We track patterns, not opinions, to locate meaning and performance in real-time.
Care-Driven Performance
We measure how care flows through your system - and how to optimise it for real impact.
Purpose-Led Evolution
We don’t replace what you’ve built; we align it to where it’s meant to go.
Testimonials
The Story of Justyce:
Helping Others to Find Their True Selves
